Resistencia de união e caracterização morfologica da dentina coronaria e radicular tratada com sistemas adesivos
Ana Carolina Machado Rocha Lima
DISSERTAÇÃO
Português
T/UNICAMP C12r
[Blond strenght and morphologic characterization of crown and root dentine treated with adhesive systems]
Piracicaba, SP : [s.n.], 2006.
85 f. : il.
Orientador: Mario Fernando de Goes
Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba
Resumo: Este estudo teve como objetivos: (a) caracterizar a morfologia, a densidade e a área transversal de túbulos dentinários da dentina coronária (profunda) e radicular (terço cervical) intactas e após condicionamento com ácido fosfórico 32% (AF) e primer condicionante do sistema adesivo...
Ver mais
Resumo: Este estudo teve como objetivos: (a) caracterizar a morfologia, a densidade e a área transversal de túbulos dentinários da dentina coronária (profunda) e radicular (terço cervical) intactas e após condicionamento com ácido fosfórico 32% (AF) e primer condicionante do sistema adesivo Clearfill Protect Bond (P); e (b) avaliar e comparar a resistência de união e os padrões de fratura obtidos na dentina coronária (profunda) e dentina radicular (terço cervical). Pré-molares humanos hígidos foram fixados em gluteraldeído (2,5%). Secções da dentina coronária profunda e dentina radicular (região cervical) foram obtidas por clivagem. Cada dente recebeu os seguintes tratamentos: G1- dentina coronária + AF; G2- dentina coronária + P; G3 - dentina coronária sem tratamento; G4- dentina radicular + AF; G5- dentina radicular + P; G6- dentina radicular sem tratamento. As secções condicionadas com primer foram imersas em etanol e acetona. Todos os grupos foram desidratados em concentrações ascendentes de álcool e HMDS e visualizadas por microscopia eletri'nica de varredura em ampliação de 1500X. As imagens obtidas foram usadas para calcular a densidade (D) e a área (A) da secção transversal dos túbulos dentinários em µm2 utilizando o programa Leica IM50. Para o teste de microtração foram utilizados fatias de dentina coronária profunda e dentina radicular cervical de 12 dentes que foram divididas em quatro grupos de acordo com a região dentinária e o sistema adesivo utilizado: G7- dentina radicular + Single Bond II; G8- dentina radicular + Clearfill Protect Bond; G9- dentina coronária + Single Bond II; G10- dentina coronária + Clearfill Protect Bond. Resina composta foi acrescentada em ambos os lados das fatias. Foram obtidas dessas fatias espécimes em forma de palito. Após armazenamento em água (37ºC) os espécimes foram submetidos ao teste de microtração em uma máquina de ensaio universal (Instron), a uma velocidade de 0,5mm/min. A dentina radicular intacta do terço cervical apresentou uma superfície irregular formada por calcosferitos, o que a difere estruturalmente da dentina coronária. Já a densidade (42.627/mm2) e a área transversal média (2,9035/ µm2) dos túbulos dentinários na raiz não revelou diferença estatisticamente significante (p> 0,05) aos valores encontrados na coroa. Os dados de resistência de união foram estatisticamente superiores na dentina coronária (26.63 MPa) do que na dentina radicular (19.76 MPa). O padrão de fratura mais frequentemente encontrado para ambas as regiões foi a fratura mista (coesiva no adesivo e na camada híbrida). ÿ possível concluir que as dentinas coronária (profunda) e radicular do (terço cervical) apresentam diferenças morfológicas e nos valores de resistência de união, porém apresentam semelhanças quanto à densidade de túbulos e padrões de fratura independente do sistema adesivo utilizado
Ver menos
Abstract: The aim of this study was to: (a) characterize the morphology, density and transversal cross-section area of tubules of deep crown and cervical root dentine, intact and after etched with 32% phosphoric acid (AF) or the self-etch primer of the Clearfill Protect Bond adhesive system (P); and...
Ver mais
Abstract: The aim of this study was to: (a) characterize the morphology, density and transversal cross-section area of tubules of deep crown and cervical root dentine, intact and after etched with 32% phosphoric acid (AF) or the self-etch primer of the Clearfill Protect Bond adhesive system (P); and (b) evaluate and compare the bond strength and the fracture patterns obtained from deep crown dentine and cervical root dentine. Human carie-free premolars (n=5) were fixed in 25% glutaraldehyde. Deep crown and root dentine sections were obtained by cleavage. Each tooth was treated as follows: G1- crown dentine + AF; G2- crown dentine and P; G3-intact crown dentine; G4- root dentine + AF; G5- root dentine + P; G6- intact root dentine. The sections etched with primer were immersed in ethanol and acetone. All groups
were dehydrated in increasing alcohol concentration and Hexamethyldisilazane, nd were visualized by Scanning Electron Microscopy. A magnification of 1500X was used to calculate the density (D) and the dentinal tubule transversal cross-section area per mm2, using the program Leica IM50. For microtensile testing, twelve premolars were cut to obtain slices of deep crown dentine and cervical root dentine. These were divided in four groups according to dentine region and adhesive system employed: G7- root dentine + Single Bond II; G8- root dentine + Clearfill Protect Bond; G9- crown dentine + Single Bond II; G10- crown dentine + Clearfill Protect Bond. Restorative was added to both sides of the slices. Beam specimens were obtained from these restored slices which were kept in water at 37ºC. The specimens were microtensile tested using a universal testing machine (Instrom) at a speed of 0,5mm/min. Intact cervical root dentine presented an irregular surface formed with calcospherites, demonstrating its structural difference from coronary dentine. On the other hand, root dentine tubule density (42,627/mm2) and average transversal area (2.9035/ µm2) did not reveal statistically significant difference (p>0.05) when compared to values obtain in crown. Bond strength results were statistically superior for crown dentine (26.63 MPa) then root dentine (19.76 MPa). Mixed fractures (cohesive in adhesive and hybrid layer) were the most frequent fracture patterns found for both regions. It is possible to conclude that deep crown dentine and cervical root dentine present morphological and bond strength differences, however, are similar in relation to tubule density and fracture patterns independent of the adhesive system employed. Ver menos
were dehydrated in increasing alcohol concentration and Hexamethyldisilazane, nd were visualized by Scanning Electron Microscopy. A magnification of 1500X was used to calculate the density (D) and the dentinal tubule transversal cross-section area per mm2, using the program Leica IM50. For microtensile testing, twelve premolars were cut to obtain slices of deep crown dentine and cervical root dentine. These were divided in four groups according to dentine region and adhesive system employed: G7- root dentine + Single Bond II; G8- root dentine + Clearfill Protect Bond; G9- crown dentine + Single Bond II; G10- crown dentine + Clearfill Protect Bond. Restorative was added to both sides of the slices. Beam specimens were obtained from these restored slices which were kept in water at 37ºC. The specimens were microtensile tested using a universal testing machine (Instrom) at a speed of 0,5mm/min. Intact cervical root dentine presented an irregular surface formed with calcospherites, demonstrating its structural difference from coronary dentine. On the other hand, root dentine tubule density (42,627/mm2) and average transversal area (2.9035/ µm2) did not reveal statistically significant difference (p>0.05) when compared to values obtain in crown. Bond strength results were statistically superior for crown dentine (26.63 MPa) then root dentine (19.76 MPa). Mixed fractures (cohesive in adhesive and hybrid layer) were the most frequent fracture patterns found for both regions. It is possible to conclude that deep crown dentine and cervical root dentine present morphological and bond strength differences, however, are similar in relation to tubule density and fracture patterns independent of the adhesive system employed. Ver menos
Goes, Mario Fernando de, 1954-
Orientador
Coutinho Filho, Tauby de Souza, 1953-
Avaliador
Resistencia de união e caracterização morfologica da dentina coronaria e radicular tratada com sistemas adesivos
Ana Carolina Machado Rocha Lima
Resistencia de união e caracterização morfologica da dentina coronaria e radicular tratada com sistemas adesivos
Ana Carolina Machado Rocha Lima
Exemplares
Nº de exemplares: 1
Não existem reservas para esta obra