Dialetica e contingencia no ceticismo em David Hume
Maria Magdalena Cunha de Mendonça
TESE
Português
(Broch.)
T/UNICAMP M523d
[Hume's dialethical and skepticism]
Campinas, SP : [s.n.], 2007.
203p. : il.
Orientador: Luiz Roberto Monzani
Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
Resumo: Este trabalho investiga a relevância da crítica humeana ao pensamento teleológico, a partir da análise crítica do argumento do desígnio exposta no texto dos Diálogos da Religião Natural e sua articulação com o projeto filosófico do autor. Objetiva-se mostrar que a reflexão de Hume a respeito...
Ver mais
Resumo: Este trabalho investiga a relevância da crítica humeana ao pensamento teleológico, a partir da análise crítica do argumento do desígnio exposta no texto dos Diálogos da Religião Natural e sua articulação com o projeto filosófico do autor. Objetiva-se mostrar que a reflexão de Hume a respeito da religião natural, não se reduz a uma espécie de querela entre teísmo e ateísmo, deixando claro o entrelaçamento existente entre a recusa do raciocínio finalista e a crítica ao determinismo teológico e científico, a fim de deixar evidente o distanciamento do filósofo escocês da metafísica, sobretudo, das filosofias das ciências e epistemologia. No texto dos Diálogos da Religião investiga-se também a estrutura argumentativa filosófica do autor no intuito de precisar o sentido dialético e referencial cético presentes na sua compreensão e uso singular do estilo dos diálogos e sua ruptura com o discurso filosófico da tradição, precisamente platf'nico-aristotélica. Em um segundo momento deste trabalho, precisamente no terceiro capítulo, a motivação maior consiste em reafirmar o tom radical da crítica humeana ao argumento do desígnio em que se investiga a articulação entre os textos dos Diálogos da Religião natural e o da História da Religião natural, procurando tornar clara a manutenção do padrão da contrariedade dialética no contraponto que Hume apresenta entre politeísmo e teísmo, bem como, a compatibilidade entre a postura de Hume na obra da História da Religião natural e a do expositor do ceticismo e crítico maior do argumento teológico no texto dos Diálogos, a saber, Philo. Além disso, ainda nesta parte do trabalho, busca-se localizar no conceito de contingências a expressão da crítica de Hume ao raciocínio teleológico da filosofia experimental da sua época, que pretende apoiar-se no postulado da análise observacional objetiva, da necessidade física da esfera natural e do agir humano. No quarto capítulo o intuito é o de analisar o duplo papel que desempenha o conceito de circunstancia no pensamento de Hume: elemento fundamental da sua visão de um cosmo antifinalista e linha mestra da sua ruptura com o pensamento teleológico presente nas reflexões tradicionais e moderna sobre os problemas morais. Detendo-se na análise da noção de valor , particularmente nas reflexões sobre o problema filosófico da felicidade, busca-se tornar clara a recusa de Hume à visão teleológica religiosa e científica em suas pretensões de padronização dos comportamentos humanos, ou s? formas de vidae??, enfim, da singularidade e diversidade das múltiplas formas de pensar, crer e viver de cada homem
Ver menos
Abstract: This work examines the relevance of the humean critique regarding the critical analysis of the argument of design ( purpose) exposed in the text of the Dialogues of Natural Religion and its articulation with the authorÂ's philosophical project. The object is to demonstrate that HumeÂ's...
Ver mais
Abstract: This work examines the relevance of the humean critique regarding the critical analysis of the argument of design ( purpose) exposed in the text of the Dialogues of Natural Religion and its articulation with the authorÂ's philosophical project. The object is to demonstrate that HumeÂ's reflection in regards to the natural religion does not confine itself to a kind of quarrel between theism and atheism, making clear the present intertwining between the refusal of the finalist reasoning and the critique to the theological and scientific determinism, in order to prove this scotch philosopherÂ's detachment from methaphysics, especially, from the philosophies of the sciences and the epistemology. The text of Dialogues of the Religion examines also the argumentative philosophical structure of the author with the purpose of determining the dialectic meaning and skeptical referential present in his comprehension and his singular utilization of style of dialogues and its rupture with the philosophical discourse of tradition, precisely platonic-aristotelian.
In a second moment of this work, precisely on the third chapter, the major motivation consists of reaffirming the radical tone of the humean critique of the design in which it examines the articulation between the texts of the Dialogues of Natural Religion and of the Natural Religion History, endeavoring to make clear the maintenance of the pattern of dialectic contrariness in the counterpoint that Hume presents between polytheism and theism, as well as, the compatibility between HumeÂ's posture in the work History of Natural Religion and that of the exposer of skepticism and principal critic of the theological argument in the text of the Dialogues, that is, Philo. Besides, still in this part of the work, one endeavors to locate in the concept of the contingences the critical expression of Hume to the teleological reasoning of the experimental philosophy of his period , which intents to base itself in the postulate of the objective observational analysis, the physical necessity of the natural sphere, and of human acting. In the fourth chapter the intention is to analyse the double role played by the concept of contingence in HumeÂ's thinking . : fundamental element of his vision of an antifinalist cosmos and main support of his rupture with the current teleological thought in the traditional and modern reflections regarding the moral problems. Lingering on the analysis of the notion of value, particularly in the reflections about the philosophical problem of happiness, it intends to make clear the refusal of Hume to the religious and scientific teleological visions in their pretensions of standardizing the human behaviors, or ¨forms of life¨ in which it becomes evident, once again, the dialectical tone of his sceptical philosophy. Accompanying the dialectic argumentative structure present in the humean texts it endeavors to stress the difficulties that Humem's dialectic-sceptic argumentative structure presents to natural religion and science in their normative and moralizing pretensions regarding the acting of individuals starting from the none in the least fortuitous abstraction of the singularity and diversity of the multiple forms of thinking , believing and living of every human being Ver menos
In a second moment of this work, precisely on the third chapter, the major motivation consists of reaffirming the radical tone of the humean critique of the design in which it examines the articulation between the texts of the Dialogues of Natural Religion and of the Natural Religion History, endeavoring to make clear the maintenance of the pattern of dialectic contrariness in the counterpoint that Hume presents between polytheism and theism, as well as, the compatibility between HumeÂ's posture in the work History of Natural Religion and that of the exposer of skepticism and principal critic of the theological argument in the text of the Dialogues, that is, Philo. Besides, still in this part of the work, one endeavors to locate in the concept of the contingences the critical expression of Hume to the teleological reasoning of the experimental philosophy of his period , which intents to base itself in the postulate of the objective observational analysis, the physical necessity of the natural sphere, and of human acting. In the fourth chapter the intention is to analyse the double role played by the concept of contingence in HumeÂ's thinking . : fundamental element of his vision of an antifinalist cosmos and main support of his rupture with the current teleological thought in the traditional and modern reflections regarding the moral problems. Lingering on the analysis of the notion of value, particularly in the reflections about the philosophical problem of happiness, it intends to make clear the refusal of Hume to the religious and scientific teleological visions in their pretensions of standardizing the human behaviors, or ¨forms of life¨ in which it becomes evident, once again, the dialectical tone of his sceptical philosophy. Accompanying the dialectic argumentative structure present in the humean texts it endeavors to stress the difficulties that Humem's dialectic-sceptic argumentative structure presents to natural religion and science in their normative and moralizing pretensions regarding the acting of individuals starting from the none in the least fortuitous abstraction of the singularity and diversity of the multiple forms of thinking , believing and living of every human being Ver menos
Monzani, Luiz Roberto, 1946-2021
Orientador
Pinto, Débora Cristina Morato
Avaliador
Ferraz Neto, Bento Prado de Almeida
Avaliador
Silva, Franklin Leopoldo e
Avaliador
Dialetica e contingencia no ceticismo em David Hume
Maria Magdalena Cunha de Mendonça
Dialetica e contingencia no ceticismo em David Hume
Maria Magdalena Cunha de Mendonça
Exemplares
Nº de exemplares: 2
Não existem reservas para esta obra