Comparative effects of different materials on alveolar preservation
Moacyr Tadeu Vicente Rodrigues, Gabriel Albuquerque Guillen, Felipe Germóglio Cardoso Macêdo, Douglas Rangel Goulart, Cláudio Ferreira Nóia
ARTIGO
Inglês
Agradecimentos: This study was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) with protocol number 2017/23712-7
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare different materials' effects on alveolar ridge preservation of postextraction sockets in anterior maxilla. In this prospective, single center, randomized, controlled clinical trial, healthy patients who needed one single anterior maxillary tooth...
Ver mais
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare different materials' effects on alveolar ridge preservation of postextraction sockets in anterior maxilla. In this prospective, single center, randomized, controlled clinical trial, healthy patients who needed one single anterior maxillary tooth extraction (including bicuspids) were selected. After a minimally traumatic extraction without complications, 44 patients were randomly allocated into 4 groups: 1) natural socket healing (blood clot), 2) xenograft and gingival free graft, 3) dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane, and 4) platelet rich fibrin plugs. Alveolar ridge height and width loss were evaluated in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and in dental casts at 3 moments: 1) preoperative (T1), 2) 7 days postoperative (T2), and 3) 120 days postoperative (T3). Height and width alveolar ridge loss detected in CBCT and in dental casts were compared among the groups (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P < .05). Forty patients (24 women and 16 men) ranging from 25 to 70 years old (mean of 42 years old) participated in this study. Group 2 showed the least alveolar ridge height loss results in CBCT (9.8 ± 1.9% at T3) and dental cast analysis (1.0 ± 0.2 mm). Groups 2 (12.7 ± 4.7% at T3) and 3 (15.4 ± 2.7% at T3) showed the least alveolar ridge width loss measured in CBCT compared with groups 1 and 4, but the difference between groups 2 and 3 were not statistically significant (P = .968). Group 3 (0.9 ± 0.2 mm) and group 2 (1.0 ± 0.2 mm) showed the least width loss compared with groups 1 and 4 in dental cast analysis. Again, the difference between groups 3 and 2 was not statistically significant (P = 1.000). In postextraction sockets of the anterior maxilla and bicuspid region, group 2 (xenogenous bone graft with free gingival graft) and group 3 (dense polytetrafluoroethylene) obtained the best results in alveolar preservation, with group 2 being more indicated when the vertical alveolar ridge preservation is mandatory
Ver menos
FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESP
2017/23712-7
Fechado
Comparative effects of different materials on alveolar preservation
Moacyr Tadeu Vicente Rodrigues, Gabriel Albuquerque Guillen, Felipe Germóglio Cardoso Macêdo, Douglas Rangel Goulart, Cláudio Ferreira Nóia
Comparative effects of different materials on alveolar preservation
Moacyr Tadeu Vicente Rodrigues, Gabriel Albuquerque Guillen, Felipe Germóglio Cardoso Macêdo, Douglas Rangel Goulart, Cláudio Ferreira Nóia
Fontes
|
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery (Fonte avulsa) |