Comparative study of chemical composition and biological activity of yellow, green, brown, and red brazilian propolis
Christiane Schineider Machado, João Benhur Mokochinski, Tatiana Onofre de Lira, Fátima de Cassia Evangelista de Oliveira, Magda Vieira Cardoso, Roseane Guimarães Ferreira, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira, Cláudia Pessoa, Osmany Cuesta-Rubio, Marta Chagas...
Christiane Schineider Machado, João Benhur Mokochinski, Tatiana Onofre de Lira, Fátima de Cassia Evangelista de Oliveira, Magda Vieira Cardoso, Roseane Guimarães Ferreira, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira, Cláudia Pessoa, Osmany Cuesta-Rubio, Marta Chagas Monteiro, Mônica Soares de Campos, Yohandra Reyes Torres
ARTIGO
Inglês
The chemical composition and biological activity of a sample of yellow propolis from Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (EEP-Y MS), were investigated for the first time and compared with green, brown, and red types of Brazilian propolis and with a sample of yellow propolis from Cuba. Overall, EEP-Y MS had...
The chemical composition and biological activity of a sample of yellow propolis from Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (EEP-Y MS), were investigated for the first time and compared with green, brown, and red types of Brazilian propolis and with a sample of yellow propolis from Cuba. Overall, EEP-Y MS had different qualitative chemical profiles, as well as different cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities when compared to the other types of propolis assessed in this study and it is a different chemotype of Brazilian propolis. Absence of phenolic compounds and the presence of mixtures of aliphatic compounds in yellow propolis were determined by analysing H-1-NMR spectra and fifteen terpenes were identified by GC-MS. EEP-Y MS showed cytotoxic activity against human tumour strain OVCAR-8 but was not active against Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria. Our results confirm the difficulty of establishing a uniform quality standard for propolis from diverse geographical origins. The most appropriate pharmacological applications of yellow types of propolis must be further investigated
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQ
FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESP
FINANCIADORA DE ESTUDOS E PROJETOS - FINEP
COORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPES
Aberto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6057650
Texto completo: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ecam/2016/6057650
Comparative study of chemical composition and biological activity of yellow, green, brown, and red brazilian propolis
Christiane Schineider Machado, João Benhur Mokochinski, Tatiana Onofre de Lira, Fátima de Cassia Evangelista de Oliveira, Magda Vieira Cardoso, Roseane Guimarães Ferreira, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira, Cláudia Pessoa, Osmany Cuesta-Rubio, Marta Chagas...
Christiane Schineider Machado, João Benhur Mokochinski, Tatiana Onofre de Lira, Fátima de Cassia Evangelista de Oliveira, Magda Vieira Cardoso, Roseane Guimarães Ferreira, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira, Cláudia Pessoa, Osmany Cuesta-Rubio, Marta Chagas Monteiro, Mônica Soares de Campos, Yohandra Reyes Torres
Comparative study of chemical composition and biological activity of yellow, green, brown, and red brazilian propolis
Christiane Schineider Machado, João Benhur Mokochinski, Tatiana Onofre de Lira, Fátima de Cassia Evangelista de Oliveira, Magda Vieira Cardoso, Roseane Guimarães Ferreira, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira, Cláudia Pessoa, Osmany Cuesta-Rubio, Marta Chagas...
Christiane Schineider Machado, João Benhur Mokochinski, Tatiana Onofre de Lira, Fátima de Cassia Evangelista de Oliveira, Magda Vieira Cardoso, Roseane Guimarães Ferreira, Alexandra Christine Helena Frankland Sawaya, Antonio Gilberto Ferreira, Cláudia Pessoa, Osmany Cuesta-Rubio, Marta Chagas Monteiro, Mônica Soares de Campos, Yohandra Reyes Torres
Fontes
|
Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine Vol. 2016 (2016), n. art. 6057650 |