To compare the overall diagnostic performance of digital panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols and to estimate the absorbed dose in the head and neck. Forty-eight panoramic radiographs were obtained from eight imaging phantoms using six exposure protocols of progressively lower tube...

To compare the overall diagnostic performance of digital panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols and to estimate the absorbed dose in the head and neck. Forty-eight panoramic radiographs were obtained from eight imaging phantoms using six exposure protocols of progressively lower tube voltages (kVp) and currents (mA), as follows: (1) 70 kVp and 12.5 mA, (2) 66 kVp and 10 mA, (3) 66 kVp and 8 mA, (4) 66 kVp and 5 mA, (5) 66 kVp and 4 mA and (6) 66 kVp and 3.2 mA. Five oral radiologists independently evaluated the images and reported all detectable radiographic findings. Intra-examiner reproducibility was assessed by re-evaluation of 25% of the images. The data were analysed using the McNemar and weighted Kappa tests. Absorbed doses of the six protocols were obtained from thermoluminescent dosimeters placed inside a Rando phantom and compared using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey (α = 0.05). The overall diagnostic performance of panoramic radiographs obtained with low-dose protocols did not differ from that of panoramic radiographs obtained with the highest dose (p > 0.05). Moreover, substantial agreement was observed between all protocols. Protocol 1 resulted in the highest absorbed dose and protocols 4, 5 and 6 in the lowest absorbed doses, with the difference being significant (p ≤ 0.05). Although digital panoramic radiography is considered a relatively low-dose examination, the radiation dose can be further reduced without negatively affecting its overall diagnostic performance. Considering the risks associated with X-rays, digital panoramic radiographs can be obtained at even lower exposure levels

COORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPES

Fechado