Influence of an intermediary base on the micro leakage of simulated class II composite resin restorations
G. M. Marchi, M. C. C. Giorgi, G. M. B. Ambrosano, M. M. Sugii, N. M. A. P. Hernandes, F. H. B. Aguiar, D. A. N. L. Lima
ARTIGO
Inglês
The aim of this in vitro study was to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with a methacrylate-based composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) or silorane-based composite (Filtek LS, 3M ESPE), varying the application of an intermediary base, using a...
Ver mais
The aim of this in vitro study was to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the microleakage of Class II cavities restored with a methacrylate-based composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) or silorane-based composite (Filtek LS, 3M ESPE), varying the application of an intermediary base, using a low-viscosity composite resin (Filtek Z350 Flow, 3M ESPE) or resinmodified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Vitrebond, 3M ESPE) and no intermediary base (control groups). Sixty cavities were prepared on the proximal surfaces of bovine teeth and were randomly divided according to the experimental groups (n=10). Following the restorative procedures and thermocycling, the samples were immersed in methylene blue for two hours. The qualitative evaluation was made using a stereomicroscope, whereby two observers analyzed the infiltration level of the dye within the tooth/filling. Microleakage scores among the groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney test (p <= 0.05). The samples were then ground and the powder was prepared for quantitative analysis in an absorbance spectrophotometer. The results were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance and the Tukey test (p <= 0.05). Results from the quantitative analysis showed that LS presented higher values of microleakage than did Z250. There was a significant difference between both composites concerning the intermediary materials, with the lowest values obtained using RMGIC as an intermediary base. Results from the qualitative analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences between composites; however, there were significant differences for both composites concerning the intermediary materials, with the lowest values obtained using RMGIC as an intermediary. It is possible to conclude that using RMGIC as an intermediary base provided lower microleakage, indicating better sealing of the tooth-restoration interface
Ver menos
Fechado
Influence of an intermediary base on the micro leakage of simulated class II composite resin restorations
G. M. Marchi, M. C. C. Giorgi, G. M. B. Ambrosano, M. M. Sugii, N. M. A. P. Hernandes, F. H. B. Aguiar, D. A. N. L. Lima
Influence of an intermediary base on the micro leakage of simulated class II composite resin restorations
G. M. Marchi, M. C. C. Giorgi, G. M. B. Ambrosano, M. M. Sugii, N. M. A. P. Hernandes, F. H. B. Aguiar, D. A. N. L. Lima
Fontes
|
Operative dentistry Vol. 39, no. 3 (MAy, 2014), p. 301-307 |