Environmental trade-offs of renewable jet fuels in Brazil : Beyond the carbon footprint
ARTIGO
Inglês
Agradecimentos: This work was carried out as part of a Dual Degree Ph.D. project under the agreement between UNICAMP and TU-DELFT. The authors acknowledge BE-Basic Foundation and CNPq-Brazil for financial support. The authors also thankfully acknowledge Brazilian Biorenewable National Laboratory...
Agradecimentos: This work was carried out as part of a Dual Degree Ph.D. project under the agreement between UNICAMP and TU-DELFT. The authors acknowledge BE-Basic Foundation and CNPq-Brazil for financial support. The authors also thankfully acknowledge Brazilian Biorenewable National Laboratory (LNBR), CNPMEM/MCTIC, for all information and support regarding sugarcane and ethanol
The use of renewable jet fuels (RJFs) is an option for meeting the greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction targets of the aviation sector. Therefore, most of the studies have focused on climate change indicators, but other environmental impacts have been disregarded. In this paper, an attributional life...
The use of renewable jet fuels (RJFs) is an option for meeting the greenhouse gases (GHG) reduction targets of the aviation sector. Therefore, most of the studies have focused on climate change indicators, but other environmental impacts have been disregarded. In this paper, an attributional life cycle assessment is performed for ten RJF pathways in Brazil, considering the environmental trade-offs between climate change and seven other categories, i.e., fossil depletion, terrestrial acidification, eutrophication, human and environmental toxicity, and air quality-related categories, such as particulate matter and photochemical oxidant formation. The scope includes sugarcane and soybean for first-generation (1G) pathways and residual materials (wood and sugarcane residues, beef tallow, and used cooking oil-UCO) for second-generation (2G) pathways. Three certified technologies to produce RJF are considered: hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA), alcohol-to-jet (ATJ), and Fischer-Tropsch (FT). Assuming the residual feedstocks as wastes or by-products, the 2G pathways are evaluated by two different approaches, in which the biomass sourcing processes are either accounted for or not. Results show that 1G pathways lead to significant GHG reductions compared to fossil kerosene from 55% (soybean/HEFA) to 65% (sugarcane/ATJ). However, the sugarcane-based pathway generated three-fold higher values than fossil kerosene for terrestrial acidification and air quality impacts, and seven-fold for eutrophication. In turn, soybean/HEFA caused five-fold higher levels of human toxicity. For 2G pathways, when the residual feedstock is assumed to be waste, the potential GHG emission reduction is over 74% with no relevant trade-offs. On the other hand, if the residual feedstocks are assumed as valuable by-products, tallow/HEFA becomes the worst option and pathways from sugarcane residues, even providing a GHG reduction of 67% to 94%, are related to higher impacts than soybean/HEFA for terrestrial acidification and air quality. FT pathways represent the lowest impacts for all categories within both approaches, followed by UCO/HEFA
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQ
Fechado
Environmental trade-offs of renewable jet fuels in Brazil : Beyond the carbon footprint
Environmental trade-offs of renewable jet fuels in Brazil : Beyond the carbon footprint
Fontes
Science of the total environment Vol. 714 (Apr., 2020), n. art. 136696 |