Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/78467
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUniversidade Estadual de Campinaspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleCarotid Stenting versus Endarterectomy Cognitive Outcomespt_BR
dc.contributor.authorda Paz, OGpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGuillaumon, ATpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLopes, TMpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWeiler, Mpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCendes, Fpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBalthazar, MLFpt_BR
unicamp.author.emailgermanooliveira@hotmail.compt_BR
unicamp.authorda Paz, Oliveira Germano Guillaumon, Ana Terezinha Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazilpt_BR
unicamp.authorLopes, Tatila Martins Weiler, Marina Cendes, Fernando Figueredo Balthazar, Marcio Luiz Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Neurol, Sao Paulo, Brazilpt_BR
dc.subject.wosArtery Stenosispt_BR
dc.subject.wosRevascularizationpt_BR
dc.subject.wosPerformancept_BR
dc.subject.wosSurgerypt_BR
dc.subject.wosRiskpt_BR
dc.description.abstractBackground: The objectives are to analyze the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive performance after a 3-month period in patients, who have undergone carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and to compare the cognitive outcomes between these 2 groups of patients. This a nonrandomized and prospective single-center experience. Methods: This study was performed in the University of Campinas Hospital from January 2010 to January 2012 and included 30 patients with carotid stenosis who received carotid interventions. Nineteen patients received CEA and 11 patients received CAS. Neuropsychologic evaluation included general cognitive, language, visuospatial, attentional, executive function, and memory tests. Results: After the follow-up period, there was improvement in episodic memory, encoding subitem (P = 0.02), and delayed recall (P = 0.02) for the CEA group. The CAS group improved in episodic memory, encoding subitem (P = 0.009), working memory (P = 0.04), and executive functions (P = 0.02). Comparing the techniques, the CAS group showed higher scores only in executive functions (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Both groups had a similar performance in cognitive tests, comparing preoperative and postoperative results. However, patients who underwent CAS tended to achieve higher scores in executive function and operational memory/attention tests.pt
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals Of Vascular Surgerypt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationAnn. Vasc. Surg.pt_BR
dc.publisher.cityNew Yorkpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryEUApt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incpt_BR
dc.date.issued2014pt_BR
dc.date.monthofcirculationMAYpt_BR
dc.identifier.citationAnnals Of Vascular Surgery. Elsevier Science Inc, v. 28, n. 4, n. 893, n. 900, 2014.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.description.volume28pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumber4pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage893pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage900pt_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.rights.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policypt_BR
dc.sourceWeb of Sciencept_BR
dc.identifier.issn0890-5096pt_BR
dc.identifier.eissn1615-5947pt_BR
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000335655700015pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.010pt_BR
dc.date.available2014-08-01T18:24:21Z
dc.date.available2015-11-26T17:03:19Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-01T18:24:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-26T17:03:19Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2014-08-01T18:24:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-26T17:03:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/78467
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/78467-
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.