Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/77565
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUniversidade Estadual de Campinaspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleTransition from Norplant to Jadelle in a clinic with extensive experience providing contraceptive implantspt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBrache, Vpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFaundes, Apt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Fpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, AGpt_BR
unicamp.author.emailbiomedica@verizon.net.dopt_BR
unicamp.authorPROFAMILIA, Biomed Res Dept, Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep Univ Estadual Campinas, CEMICAMP, BR-13083970 Sao Paulo, Brazilpt_BR
dc.subjectacceptabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectcontraceptive implantspt_BR
dc.subjectJadellept_BR
dc.subjectNorplantpt_BR
dc.subjecttraining requirementspt_BR
dc.subject.wosLevonorgestrelpt_BR
dc.subject.wosPerformancept_BR
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to understand the transition process from providing Norplant, the six-capsule first contraceptive implant system, to providing Jadelle, the two-rod second-generation system, in a clinical setting with extensive experience providing Norplant implants. Materials and Methods: Two hundred forty-nine women requesting contraceptive implants from the PROFAMILIA clinic (Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic) were provided with information regarding the differences and similarities between the two implant systems being studied, including the easier insertion and removal procedures and the possible shorter use life associated with Jadelle. A questionnaire evaluating their preference and the reason why they chose either system was provided. The health care providers' opinions about the two systems were also studied. Results: Fifty-three percent of the women preferred Jadelle over Norplant. The main reason behind their preference for Jadelle was its reduced number of implants with easier insertion and removal and less visibility in the arm, whereas that for Norplant was greater familiarity. Providers overwhelmingly preferred Jadelle. A 1-h presentation was sufficient training for providers experienced with Norplant. None had any problem with the management of Jadelle. Conclusion: The inclusion of Jadelle in a clinic with extensive experience with Norplant was easy and uneventful, but both methods should be available during a transition period of several months while confidence in the new method is being acquired by the community. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.pt
dc.relation.ispartofContraceptionpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationContraceptionpt_BR
dc.publisher.cityNew Yorkpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryEUApt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incpt_BR
dc.date.issued2006pt_BR
dc.date.monthofcirculationAPRpt_BR
dc.identifier.citationContraception. Elsevier Science Inc, v. 73, n. 4, n. 364, n. 367, 2006.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.description.volume73pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumber4pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage364pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage367pt_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.rights.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policypt_BR
dc.sourceWeb of Sciencept_BR
dc.identifier.issn0010-7824pt_BR
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000236377500010pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.contraception.2005.10.015pt_BR
dc.date.available2014-11-15T18:25:46Z
dc.date.available2015-11-26T17:21:17Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-15T18:25:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-26T17:21:17Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2014-11-15T18:25:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WOS000236377500010.pdf: 149295 bytes, checksum: 633a69d95fbeccac5741bcbe300fe335 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-26T17:21:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 WOS000236377500010.pdf: 149295 bytes, checksum: 633a69d95fbeccac5741bcbe300fe335 (MD5) WOS000236377500010.pdf.txt: 18691 bytes, checksum: 0700ae36493aeda2edbae3005cc1f6d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/77565pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/77565
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/77565-
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WOS000236377500010.pdf145.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.