Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/73914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.CRUESPUniversidade Estadual de Campinaspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de periódicopt_BR
dc.titleSurgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgerypt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Ept_BR
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Upt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSilva, GDpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMariano, MBpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorNetto, NRpt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBillis, Apt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMagna, LApt_BR
unicamp.author.emaildoutorelcio@terra.com.brpt_BR
unicamp.authorUniv Estadual Campinas, Dept Urol, BR-13013161 Campinas, Brazilpt_BR
dc.subjectcancerpt_BR
dc.subjectlaparoscopypt_BR
dc.subjectneoplasmpt_BR
dc.subjectprostatept_BR
dc.subjectprostate cancerpt_BR
dc.subjectprostate neoplasmpt_BR
dc.subjectprostatectomypt_BR
dc.subjectprostatic adenocarcinomapt_BR
dc.subjectprostatic cancerpt_BR
dc.subject.wosCancerpt_BR
dc.description.abstractObjectives To compare positive surgical margins in both radical retropubic prostatectomies and laparoscopic surgery in two reference centres in Brazil. Materials and methods One hundred and seventy nine pathological studies from patients, who underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate adenocarcinoma, 89 submitted to retropubic surgery and 90 to laparoscopic surgery, were analyzed. Inclusion criteriaPatients with PSA <= 15 ng/ml, and a Gleason score <= 7 at the prostate biopsy, maximum T2 clinical staging. Results There has been surgical margin compromising in 41.57% of the patients submitted to retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), 34.21% of which were at pT2 stage and 84.61% were at pT3 stage. In patients submitted to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) positive surgical margin was found at 24.44% of the cases: 20.98% of which were at pT2 stage and 55.55% at pT3 stage. Conclusions In the analyzed samples, proportion of positive surgical margin was higher in RRP than in LRP (P = 0.023). A higher number of patients on a randomized prospective study would be necessary for a better comparison between the groups.pt
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urology And Nephrologypt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofabbreviationInt. Urol. Nephrol.pt_BR
dc.publisher.cityDordrechtpt_BR
dc.publisher.countryHolandapt_BR
dc.publisherSpringerpt_BR
dc.date.issued2007pt_BR
dc.date.monthofcirculationSEPpt_BR
dc.identifier.citationInternational Urology And Nephrology. Springer, v. 39, n. 3, n. 865, n. 869, 2007.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.description.volume39pt_BR
dc.description.issuenumber3pt_BR
dc.description.firstpage865pt_BR
dc.description.lastpage869pt_BR
dc.rightsfechadopt_BR
dc.rights.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0pt_BR
dc.sourceWeb of Sciencept_BR
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623pt_BR
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000249214000034pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11255-006-9128-zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-11-19T11:45:14Z
dc.date.available2015-11-26T18:02:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-19T11:45:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-26T18:02:54Z-
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2014-11-19T11:45:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 WOS000249214000034.pdf: 124976 bytes, checksum: 07f256c59e10a17b82f853183c0e6985 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-11-26T18:02:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 WOS000249214000034.pdf: 124976 bytes, checksum: 07f256c59e10a17b82f853183c0e6985 (MD5) WOS000249214000034.pdf.txt: 15437 bytes, checksum: cfd81d23351aef2553d35c0004248adc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/73914pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/handle/REPOSIP/73914
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/73914-
Appears in Collections:Unicamp - Artigos e Outros Documentos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WOS000249214000034.pdf122.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.